From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-378828-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28768 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2012 11:11:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 28755 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jan 2012 11:11:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_UF
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:11:07 +0000
From: "markus at trippelsdorf dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51760] [4.7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: markus at trippelsdorf dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-51760-4-5GDhrABXrq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51760-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51760-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00503.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51760

Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |markus at trippelsdorf dot
                   |                            |de

--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> 2012-01-05 11:10:46 UTC ---
 typedef size_t;
__attribute__ ( ( __always_inline__ ) ) memmove ( void *__dest, void *__src,
                                                  size_t __len )
{
  return __builtin___memmove_chk ( __dest, __src, 0, __builtin_object_size );
}

expand_multibyte (  )
{
  int buf[0];
  int *bufpos;

  for ( ;; )
    {
      memmove ( buf, bufpos, 0 );
      bufpos = buf;
    }
}