public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug ada/51775] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck"
@ 2012-01-06 13:47 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-01-06 17:55 ` [Bug ada/51775] [4.6/4.7 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2012-01-06 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775
Bug #: 51775
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb
scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: dominiq@lps.ens.fr
CC: ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr, iains@gcc.gnu.org,
krebbel@gcc.gnu.org
Target: s390x-*-* powerpc-apple-darwin9
The test gnat.dg/pack9.adb has started to fail in 64 bit mode between revisions
182179 (OK) and 182258:
[karma] f90/bug% grep gnat_rcheck pack9.adb.149t.optimized
.gnat_rcheck_21 ("pack9.adb", 11);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/51775] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck"
2012-01-06 13:47 [Bug ada/51775] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck" dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2012-01-06 17:55 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-06 17:59 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-06 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-01-06
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot
| |gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3
Summary|[4.7 Regression] FAIL: |[4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL:
|gnat.dg/pack9.adb |gnat.dg/pack9.adb
|scan-tree-dump-not |scan-tree-dump-not
|optimized "gnat_rcheck" |optimized "gnat_rcheck"
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-06 17:55:12 UTC ---
Same on MIPS/IRIX. This is only a pessimization though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/51775] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck"
2012-01-06 13:47 [Bug ada/51775] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck" dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-01-06 17:55 ` [Bug ada/51775] [4.6/4.7 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-06 17:59 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-06 19:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-06 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ebotcazou at gcc dot
|gnu.org |gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-06 17:58:39 UTC ---
Investigating.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug ada/51775] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck"
2012-01-06 13:47 [Bug ada/51775] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck" dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-01-06 17:55 ` [Bug ada/51775] [4.6/4.7 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-06 17:59 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-06 19:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-09 10:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51775] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-06 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck"
2012-01-06 13:47 [Bug ada/51775] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck" dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-06 19:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-09 10:36 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-09 12:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-09 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|ada |tree-optimization
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-09 10:35:19 UTC ---
Recategorizing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck"
2012-01-06 13:47 [Bug ada/51775] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck" dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-09 10:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51775] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-09 12:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-09 14:08 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-09 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|ebotcazou at gcc dot |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-09 12:23:55 UTC ---
I have a patch (the regression is that DOM no longer catches this). FRE/PRE
are just too dumb without any good reason.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck"
2012-01-06 13:47 [Bug ada/51775] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck" dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-09 12:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-09 14:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-09 14:10 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-09 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P4 |P3
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: |[4.6 Regression] FAIL:
|gnat.dg/pack9.adb |gnat.dg/pack9.adb
|scan-tree-dump-not |scan-tree-dump-not
|optimized "gnat_rcheck" |optimized "gnat_rcheck"
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-09 14:07:55 UTC ---
Fixed for trunk sofar.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6/4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck"
2012-01-06 13:47 [Bug ada/51775] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck" dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-09 14:08 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-09 14:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-09 17:56 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-09 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-09 14:06:41 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 9 14:06:31 2012
New Revision: 183012
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183012
Log:
2012-01-09 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/51775
* tree-ssa-sccvn.c (visit_use): Value-number throwing stmts.
* tree-ssa-pre.c (eliminate): Properly fixup EH info.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c
trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck"
2012-01-06 13:47 [Bug ada/51775] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck" dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-09 14:10 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-09 17:56 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-01 15:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-12 16:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-09 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot
| |gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-09 17:53:43 UTC ---
Thanks for the fix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck"
2012-01-06 13:47 [Bug ada/51775] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck" dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-09 17:56 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-01 15:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-12 16:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-01 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.6.3 |4.6.4
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-01 14:39:07 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.3 is being released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck"
2012-01-06 13:47 [Bug ada/51775] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck" dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-01 15:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-04-12 16:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-04-12 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.7.0
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-12 16:17:56 UTC ---
The 4.6 branch has been closed, fixed in GCC 4.7.0.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-12 16:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-01-06 13:47 [Bug ada/51775] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/pack9.adb scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gnat_rcheck" dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-01-06 17:55 ` [Bug ada/51775] [4.6/4.7 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-06 17:59 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-06 19:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-09 10:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51775] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-09 12:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-09 14:08 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-09 14:10 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-09 17:56 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51775] [4.6 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-01 15:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-12 16:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).