From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2559 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2012 13:13:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 2114 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Feb 2012 13:13:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:13:12 +0000 From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/51782] -ftree-sra: Missing address-space information leads to wrong Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:20:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: addr-space, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: URL Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg02071.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 Martin Jambor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p | |atches/2012-02/msg01080.htm | |l --- Comment #27 from Martin Jambor 2012-02-21 13:12:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) > > Unfortunately, with the patch I got following new LTO link failures on > > x86_64-linux: > > > > gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-1 c_lto_trans-mem-1_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-1_1.o link, -flto > > -fgnu-tm > > gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-2 c_lto_trans-mem-2_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-2_1.o link, -flto > > -fgnu-tm > > gcc.dg/lto/trans-mem-4 c_lto_trans-mem-4_0.o-c_lto_trans-mem-4_1.o link, -flto > > -fgnu-tm > > > > I'll have a look a that, even though they look rather scary. > > Don't you see the failures without the patch (see pr52297)? No, I don't, for some reason. Nevertheless, it indeed seems to be an unrelated problem and so I have posted the patch to the mailing list and now only wait for test results on a platform with address spaces: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg01080.html