public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51782] -ftree-sra: Missing address-space information leads to wrong Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:52:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-51782-4-wJjZ4vyNxS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-51782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782 --- Comment #17 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-17 17:59:43 UTC --- Created attachment 26695 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26695 Untested proposed fix This untested patch fixes the issue for me on a cross-compiler. It would be great if someone who is set up to run the testsuite on a platform with multiple address spaces or a simulator of one could test it a bit. My plan is to discuss this with maintainers next week and if they like the approach, give it a formal bootstrap and test run on x86_64 and submit shortly thereafter if everything goes fine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-17 18:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-01-07 12:03 [Bug tree-optimization/51782] New: Missing address-space information leads to wrong code gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-07 12:04 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51782] " gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-07 12:06 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-07 12:08 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-07 12:10 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-07 12:11 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-07 12:12 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-07 12:17 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-09 12:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-09 20:30 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-12 16:19 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-12 17:18 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51782] -ftree-sra: Missing address-space information leads to wrong jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-12 18:09 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-17 15:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-18 9:34 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-25 19:18 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-17 13:06 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-17 18:01 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-17 18:52 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2012-02-19 10:16 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-20 9:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-20 17:57 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-20 20:15 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2012-02-21 10:14 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-21 10:41 ` [Bug middle-end/51782] " jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-21 10:41 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-21 11:51 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-02-21 11:58 ` gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-21 13:20 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-22 10:55 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-22 11:00 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-51782-4-wJjZ4vyNxS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).