From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-383998-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12020 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2012 09:29:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 12010 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Feb 2012 09:29:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:28:37 +0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51782] -ftree-sra: Missing address-space information leads to wrong
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: addr-space, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51782-4-yqOM8EyQgW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51782-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg01932.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782

--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2012-02-20 09:27:48 UTC ---
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51782
> 
> --- Comment #17 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-17 17:59:43 UTC ---
> Created attachment 26695
>   --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26695
> Untested proposed fix
> 
> This untested patch fixes the issue for me on a cross-compiler.  It
> would be great if someone who is set up to run the testsuite on a
> platform with multiple address spaces or a simulator of one could test
> it a bit.
> 
> My plan is to discuss this with maintainers next week and if they like
> the approach, give it a formal bootstrap and test run on x86_64 and
> submit shortly thereafter if everything goes fine.

base returned from get_base_address should never be NULL, so it's
safe to assume it isn't.  Otherwise the patch looks ok to me.

Richard.