From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26878 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2012 13:31:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 26863 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Mar 2012 13:31:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:31:45 +0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51785] gets not anymore declared Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:31:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-01 13:30:26 UTC --- f17 doesn't include glibc 2.16, just patched glibc 2.15, which doesn't have these header changes yet. The thing I don't like on the last patch is that it hardcodes configure time tests, so when glibc is upgraded say from 2.15 to 2.16, but gcc isn't upgraded, suddenly anything that includes fails to compile. So I'd prefer something like #c14 patch instead, perhaps testing a macro that is depending on __GLIBC_PREREQ defined in linux os-defines.h. Can you please resolve this either way till tomorrow noon UTC (4.7 branching/4.7.0-rc1)? Thanks.