From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14318 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2012 16:16:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 14304 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jan 2012 16:16:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:16:29 +0000 From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/51786] New: [c++0x] Invalid declaration with decltype accepted Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:16:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00737.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51786 Bug #: 51786 Summary: [c++0x] Invalid declaration with decltype accepted Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: reichelt@gcc.gnu.org The error message "declaration does not declare anything" is not triggered in certain cases when using decltype: =================================== struct A {}; void foo() { decltype(A()); } =================================== It *is* triggered if I write decltype(int) instead. Another testcase is the following: =================================== template struct A { A() { decltype(this); } }; A<0> a; =================================== It *is* triggered if I make A a non-template class. This bug is similar to PR21120 where the same problems occured with "typeof".