public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51798] [4.7 regression] libstdc++ atomicity performance regression due to __sync_fetch_and_add Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:27:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-51798-4-H6tgHw03vu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-51798-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-25 14:08:41 UTC --- At least at this point I'd feel much safer if libstdc++ used just acq_rel semantics for the all atomic_fetch_and_add places, instead of somewhere acq and somewhere rel semantics.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-25 14:09 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-01-09 14:31 [Bug libstdc++/51798] New: " dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-09 14:36 ` [Bug libstdc++/51798] " dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-09 14:38 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-09 15:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-09 17:12 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-24 7:45 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2012-01-24 16:46 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-24 16:51 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2012-01-25 14:27 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2012-01-25 15:39 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-25 16:09 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2012-01-25 16:17 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-26 13:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-26 14:38 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2012-01-26 15:50 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-26 15:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-26 21:50 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-26 22:08 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27 10:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27 13:03 ` amacleod at redhat dot com 2012-01-27 14:55 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27 15:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27 15:26 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27 20:15 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27 21:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-27 21:08 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09 8:46 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09 9:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09 20:08 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-09 23:22 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-10 18:21 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-13 21:31 ` rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-17 21:03 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-51798-4-H6tgHw03vu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).