From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4308 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2012 18:35:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 4155 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2012 18:35:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:34:55 +0000 From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/51800] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Error: Automatic array 'dummy' at (1) cannot have an initializer Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:35:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.3 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Keywords CC Known to work Target Milestone Summary Known to fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00899.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51800 Tobias Burnus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |rejects-valid CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org, | |toon at moene dot org Known to work| |4.6.2 Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3 Summary|Error: Automatic array |[4.6/4.7 Regression] Error: |'dummy' at (1) cannot have |Automatic array 'dummy' at |an initializer |(1) cannot have an | |initializer Known to fail| |4.7.0 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-09 18:34:52 UTC --- I think that's due to the patch for PR 51310, i.e. the patches: [4.7] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-12/msg00080.html [4.6] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-12/msg00119.html Toon, can you have a look?