* [Bug target/51819] [4.7 Regression] Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]'
2012-01-11 5:44 [Bug target/51819] New: [4.7 Regression ]Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]' thejes.k at gmail dot com
@ 2012-01-11 9:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-11 14:52 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-11 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51819
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Summary|[4.7 Regression ]Neon wrong |[4.7 Regression] Neon wrong
|code generation, Error: |code generation, Error:
|unsupported alignment for |unsupported alignment for
|instruction -- `vst1.32 |instruction -- `vst1.32
|{d2[0]},[r0:64]' |{d2[0]},[r0:64]'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/51819] [4.7 Regression] Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]'
2012-01-11 5:44 [Bug target/51819] New: [4.7 Regression ]Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]' thejes.k at gmail dot com
2012-01-11 9:36 ` [Bug target/51819] [4.7 Regression] Neon " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-11 14:52 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-13 5:33 ` thejes.k at gmail dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-11 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51819
Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-01-11
CC| |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-11 14:51:37 UTC ---
Completely untested but I think this is the correct fix for this problem.
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
index 4c310d4..31f03cc 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
@@ -17720,7 +17720,7 @@ arm_print_operand (FILE *stream, rtx x, int code)
align_bits = 256;
else if ((memsize == 8 || memsize == 16) && (align % 16) == 0)
align_bits = 128;
- else if ((align % 8) == 0)
+ else if ((memsize >= 8) && (align % 8) == 0)
align_bits = 64;
else
align_bits = 0;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/51819] [4.7 Regression] Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]'
2012-01-11 5:44 [Bug target/51819] New: [4.7 Regression ]Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]' thejes.k at gmail dot com
2012-01-11 9:36 ` [Bug target/51819] [4.7 Regression] Neon " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-11 14:52 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-13 5:33 ` thejes.k at gmail dot com
2012-01-19 12:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: thejes.k at gmail dot com @ 2012-01-13 5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51819
--- Comment #2 from Thejes Kuttian <thejes.k at gmail dot com> 2012-01-13 05:32:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Completely untested but I think this is the correct fix for this problem.
>
>
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
> index 4c310d4..31f03cc 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
> @@ -17720,7 +17720,7 @@ arm_print_operand (FILE *stream, rtx x, int code)
> align_bits = 256;
> else if ((memsize == 8 || memsize == 16) && (align % 16) == 0)
> align_bits = 128;
> - else if ((align % 8) == 0)
> + else if ((memsize >= 8) && (align % 8) == 0)
> align_bits = 64;
> else
> align_bits = 0;
Confirmed. This patch fixes the issue for me .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/51819] [4.7 Regression] Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]'
2012-01-11 5:44 [Bug target/51819] New: [4.7 Regression ]Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]' thejes.k at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-13 5:33 ` thejes.k at gmail dot com
@ 2012-01-19 12:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-20 10:16 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-19 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51819
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|arm |arm-*-*
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-19 12:51:33 UTC ---
Ping?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/51819] [4.7 Regression] Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]'
2012-01-11 5:44 [Bug target/51819] New: [4.7 Regression ]Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]' thejes.k at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-19 12:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-20 10:16 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-20 13:38 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-20 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51819
Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/51819] [4.7 Regression] Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]'
2012-01-11 5:44 [Bug target/51819] New: [4.7 Regression ]Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]' thejes.k at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-20 10:16 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-20 13:38 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-20 14:17 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-16 15:20 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-20 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51819
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-20 13:24:53 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Jan 20 13:24:47 2012
New Revision: 183338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183338
Log:
Fix PR target/51819
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/51819] [4.7 Regression] Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]'
2012-01-11 5:44 [Bug target/51819] New: [4.7 Regression ]Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]' thejes.k at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-20 13:38 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-20 14:17 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-16 15:20 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-20 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51819
Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-20 13:26:14 UTC ---
Fixed. .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/51819] [4.7 Regression] Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]'
2012-01-11 5:44 [Bug target/51819] New: [4.7 Regression ]Neon wrong code generation, Error: unsupported alignment for instruction -- `vst1.32 {d2[0]},[r0:64]' thejes.k at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-20 14:17 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-16 15:20 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-16 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51819
--- Comment #6 from Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-16 15:19:47 UTC ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Mon Apr 16 15:19:43 2012
New Revision: 186498
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186498
Log:
2012-04-16 Ulrich Weigand <ulrich.weigand@linaro.org>
PR target/51819
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_print_operand): Fix invalid alignment
hints for 'A' operand types.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread