From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-379486-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13351 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2012 11:28:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 13337 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2012 11:28:38 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:28:25 +0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/51821] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] 64bit > 32bit conversion produces incorrect results with optimizations
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.5.4
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Keywords Component
Message-ID: <bug-51821-4-tSdlvWBy5u@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51821-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51821-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg01161.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51821

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
          Component|c                           |target

--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-11 11:28:08 UTC ---
I believe this is a target issue.  We produce

test:
.LFB0:
        .cfi_startproc
        movl    4(%esp), %ecx
        movl    $-1, %eax
        xorl    %edx, %edx
        sall    %cl, %eax
        testb   $32, %cl
        cmovne  %eax, %edx
        cmovne  %edx, %eax
        ret

but as this is a SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED target the sall instruction does
nothing, so shifting DImode by 32 is not implemented correctly on i?86
(ix86_split_ashl).