From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26634 invoked by alias); 13 May 2012 00:05:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 26621 invoked by uid 22791); 13 May 2012 00:05:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 May 2012 00:05:05 +0000 From: "bugs at sehe dot nl" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/51829] decltype() deduces non-const but only in a template Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 03:38:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bugs at sehe dot nl X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg01348.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51829 --- Comment #5 from Seth Heeren 2012-05-13 00:05:00 UTC --- On 13-05-12 00:46, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > Still waiting. Really. Well, to be honest, I can't afford to spend even more time minimizing that any further. I have to pick priorities. For quick win, of course, you could check whether the problem still exists with GCC 4.7 or dev versions. It might have been fixed in the process of other development/fixes. God knows I had spent over 6 hours trying to minimize that by manually decimating the preprocessed sources even before initially posting the report. And it wasn't even my own bug; it was a support call on the [spirit-general] list. I don't think it is worth my time to **learn** how to further reduce the testcase further, since that seems to be a highly specialized craft and, tools could do a good job. I'd be rather surprised if the GCC team didn't have just such tools, as well as people skilled and experienced in using them. All of the above would require a lot of time on my side, and sadly I don't have it. Regards Seth