From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-379660-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28565 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2012 06:29:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 28553 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jan 2012 06:29:44 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:29:31 +0000
From: "prasoonsaurav.nit at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/51834] New: -Wsequence-point fails when convoluted expressions with multiple side effects are used
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:29:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: prasoonsaurav.nit at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51834-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg01335.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51834

             Bug #: 51834
           Summary: -Wsequence-point fails when convoluted expressions
                    with multiple side effects are used
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.6
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: prasoonsaurav.nit@gmail.com


Consider the following example


int main()
{ 
      int i=10;
      i += (i , i++, i) + i; // also invokes UB
}


prasoon@Prasoon:~/test_code$ cat ub.c
int main()
{ 
      int i=10;
      i += (i , i++, i) + i; // also invokes UB
}
prasoon@Prasoon:~/test_code$ gcc -Wsequence-point ub.c
prasoon@Prasoon:~/test_code$ 

I don't get any warning like 'operation on 'i' may be undefined.

Another similar example

int main()
{
    char *str;
    char array[100]= "Hello";
    if((str = array)[0] == 'H'){
         //do something
    }
}

As per my understanding (str = array)[0] also invokes UB but no warning is
given by gcc even after using that option.