public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/51836] New: -Wsequence-point fails when convoluted expressions with multiple side effects are used (C++03)
@ 2012-01-12 9:11 prasoonsaurav.nit at gmail dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: prasoonsaurav.nit at gmail dot com @ 2012-01-12 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51836
Bug #: 51836
Summary: -Wsequence-point fails when convoluted expressions
with multiple side effects are used (C++03)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: prasoonsaurav.nit@gmail.com
Consider the following example
int main()
{
int i=10;
i += (i , i++, i) + i; // also invokes UB
}
prasoon@Prasoon:~/test_code$ cat ub.cpp
int main()
{
int i=10;
i += (i , i++, i) + i; // also invokes UB
}
prasoon@Prasoon:~/test_code$ g++ -Wsequence-point ub.cpp
prasoon@Prasoon:~/test_code$
I don't get any warning like 'operation on 'i' may be undefined.
Another similar example
int main()
{
char *str;
char array[100]= "Hello";
if((str = array)[0] == 'H'){
//do something
}
}
As per my understanding (str = array)[0] also invokes UB but no warning is
given by g++ even after using that option.
Another example is
int main()
{
int a = 10;
++a = 100; // UB
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-01-12 9:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-01-12 9:11 [Bug c++/51836] New: -Wsequence-point fails when convoluted expressions with multiple side effects are used (C++03) prasoonsaurav.nit at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).