From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32454 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2012 23:06:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 32434 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2012 23:06:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:06:09 +0000 From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/51876] New: [4.7 regression] Recent extra neon related testsuite regressions on arm-linux-gnueabi Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 01:31:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg01856.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51876 Bug #: 51876 Summary: [4.7 regression] Recent extra neon related testsuite regressions on arm-linux-gnueabi Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: ramana@gcc.gnu.org A noticed a few of the neon tests are failing for arm-linux-gnueabi started failing recently. Skimming through some results on gcc-testresults I see that http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-01/msg01284.html have these failures while this set of results http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-01/msg00370.html that these tests were passing. Therefore this is a recent regression. FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombinef32.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombinef32.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombinep16.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombinep16.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombinep8.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombinep8.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombines16.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombines16.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombines32.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombines32.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombines64.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombines64.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombines8.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombines8.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombineu16.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombineu16.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombineu32.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombineu32.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombineu64.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombineu64.c (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombineu8.c (internal compiler error) FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vcombineu8.c (test for excess errors)