From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13724 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2012 17:15:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 13626 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Feb 2012 17:15:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:14:47 +0000 From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51906] thread lock test failures on darwin11 under Xcode 4.2 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:15:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00379.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906 --- Comment #44 from Iain Sandoe 2012-02-03 17:14:43 UTC --- if you are saying that: code targeted at 10.6 produced on 10.7 (using the correct 10.6 SDK) doesn't run properly on 10.7 - no surprise - that's just exposing the OS bug. If you are saying: code targeted at 10.6 produced on 10.7 (using the correct 10.6 SDK) doesn't run properly on 10.6, then that is something that people should be concerned about.