From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8792 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2012 17:01:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 8766 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Feb 2012 17:01:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:01:37 +0000 From: "howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51906] thread lock test failures on darwin11 under Xcode 4.2 Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00377.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906 --- Comment #43 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-03 17:00:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #42) > That header isn't even installed, let alone included, on other targets > > Jack, if you test it please change == to >= in > libstdc++-v3/config/os/bsd/darwin/os_defines.h While this appears to work for the generic testsuite run, breakage can still be exposed by appending... -mmacosx-version-min=10.6 to the compilation line for 30_threads/lock/3.cc etc. I expected this problem because the proposed fix doesn't handle the situation of targeting 10.6 on Lion. I complained about this on darwin-dev earlier today... http://lists.apple.com/archives/darwin-dev/2012/Feb/msg00009.html but the darwin developers seem strangely unbothered by different OS releases producing different code for the same target OS release. http://lists.apple.com/archives/darwin-dev/2012/Feb/msg00011.html