public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/51918] New: [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs
@ 2012-01-20 17:54 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-20 21:41 ` [Bug c++/51918] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-20 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51918
Bug #: 51918
Summary: [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ro@gcc.gnu.org
Host: mips-sgi-irix6.5
Target: mips-sgi-irix6.5
Build: mips-sgi-irix6.5
Since at least 20111216 (the port didn't bootstrap for almost 3 months before
that),
the g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C test FAILs on IRIX 6.5:
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C -std=c++11 (test for errors, line 28)
This happens for both N32 and N64 ABIs, but only for C++11, -std=c++98 is fine.
This is a regression from 4.6.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/51918] [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs 2012-01-20 17:54 [Bug c++/51918] New: [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-20 21:41 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 7:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22 17:13 ` [Bug c++/51918] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs in C++11 mode rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-20 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51918 Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-20 20:06:46 UTC --- Are you sure this is a regression? We didn't run the testsuite in C++0x mode in 4.6. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/51918] [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs 2012-01-20 17:54 [Bug c++/51918] New: [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-20 21:41 ` [Bug c++/51918] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-21 7:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22 17:13 ` [Bug c++/51918] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs in C++11 mode rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-21 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51918 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target|mips-sgi-irix6.5 |mips*-*-* Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2012-01-21 Host|mips-sgi-irix6.5 |mips*-*-* Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Build|mips-sgi-irix6.5 |mips*-*-* --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-21 05:45:07 UTC --- Also fails on mips64-linux-gnu. For both N32 and N64. I have not looked into why it only fails for MIPS but not for any other target. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/51918] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs in C++11 mode 2012-01-20 17:54 [Bug c++/51918] New: [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-20 21:41 ` [Bug c++/51918] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 7:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-22 17:13 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-22 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51918 rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|[4.7 regression] |g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6 |g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6 |.C FAILs in C++11 mode |.C FAILs | --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-22 17:02:59 UTC --- As discussed on the lists, the extra xfail only applies to targets that define TARGET_PTRMEMFUNC_VBIT_LOCATION to ptrmemfunc_vbit_in_delta. In other respects it falls into the same category as the existing c++11 xfails. I committed the xfail before seeing this PR. I suppose we should keep the bug open to track all three xfails. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-22 17:03 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-01-20 17:54 [Bug c++/51918] New: [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-20 21:41 ` [Bug c++/51918] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-21 7:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-22 17:13 ` [Bug c++/51918] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs in C++11 mode rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).