[Bug c++/51918] New: [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs

[Bug c++/51918] New: [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs

[ro at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51918

             Bug #: 51918
           Summary: [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: ro@gcc.gnu.org
              Host: mips-sgi-irix6.5
            Target: mips-sgi-irix6.5
             Build: mips-sgi-irix6.5


Since at least 20111216 (the port didn't bootstrap for almost 3 months before
that),
the g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C test FAILs on IRIX 6.5:

FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C -std=c++11  (test for errors, line 28)

This happens for both N32 and N64 ABIs, but only for C++11, -std=c++98 is fine.

This is a regression from 4.6.

  Rainer

[Bug c++/51918] [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs

[jason at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51918

Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-20 20:06:46 UTC ---
Are you sure this is a regression?  We didn't run the testsuite in C++0x mode
in 4.6.

[Bug c++/51918] [4.7 regression] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51918

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|mips-sgi-irix6.5            |mips*-*-*
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-01-21
               Host|mips-sgi-irix6.5            |mips*-*-*
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
              Build|mips-sgi-irix6.5            |mips*-*-*

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-21 05:45:07 UTC ---
Also fails on mips64-linux-gnu.  For both N32 and N64.  I have not looked into
why it only fails for MIPS but not for any other target.

[Bug c++/51918] g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6.C FAILs in C++11 mode

[rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51918

rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
            Summary|[4.7 regression]            |g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6
                   |g++.old-deja/g++.pt/ptrmem6 |.C FAILs in C++11 mode
                   |.C FAILs                    |

--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-22 17:02:59 UTC ---
As discussed on the lists, the extra xfail only applies
to targets that define TARGET_PTRMEMFUNC_VBIT_LOCATION
to ptrmemfunc_vbit_in_delta.  In other respects it falls
into the same category as the existing c++11 xfails.

I committed the xfail before seeing this PR.  I suppose
we should keep the bug open to track all three xfails.