From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13074 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2012 10:51:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 13063 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Feb 2012 10:51:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:51:23 +0000 From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/51921] [4.6/4.7 regression] EH unwinding support is broken Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:51:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: critical X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.3 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg01149.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-11 10:50:53 UTC --- > Did the revert fix any regression that was reported as a bug and has gotten > a testcase? If not, then the proper way to address this new regression is > to revert the revert especially as it appearantly happened during stage4(?) Yes, the revert fixes a regression (6 ACATS tests + 4 gnat.dg tests) and no, it didn't happen during stage4. Let's try to do something under PR target/52205.