From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25209 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2012 12:32:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 25201 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2012 12:32:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:32:41 +0000 From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/51929] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed with -O2 -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-cp-clone Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:32:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg01066.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2012-02-10 12:31:24 UTC --- Yes, it looks OK to me. Thanks! Perhaps we will eventually need to give up on this sanity check as the transformations we do to callgraph gets more general... Honza