From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17479 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2012 08:26:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 17421 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Feb 2012 08:26:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:25:23 +0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/51930] [4.7 regression] Explicitly instantiated template gets hidden visibility Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:48:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg01616.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2012-02-16 08:23:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > But think about a header only library. My test case isn't that far fetched. A > simple struct with no member functions (except for the implicitly generated > ones) should need no visibility at all, in my opinion. Sure, but then why do you want the instantiation to have higher visibility? It doesn't make sense to me for a function that has that type in the signature to have higher visibility than the type itself.