From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-380814-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29811 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2012 23:16:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 29803 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jan 2012 23:16:42 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:16:29 +0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/51934] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C  -O0  (test for excess errors) on powerpc*-*-*
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51934-4-5hk7e29Frq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg02489.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934

--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-01-21 23:15:31 UTC ---
> The test just should use some attribute that is common to all targets, like
> __attribute__((noinline)) or similar, unless it didn't fail with that attribute
> before the fix.  If it didn't, then the test needs to be limited to targets
> that support it.

The attribute format seems to do the trick: it hangs on 4.6.2 and compiles with
recent trunk.

--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C    2012-01-20
11:40:19.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C    2012-01-22 00:13:16.000000000
+0100
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ class A;
 template <class T>
 class B
 {
-  friend __attribute__((cdecl)) A& operator >>(A& a, B& b)
+  friend __attribute__((format)) A& operator >>(A& a, B& b)
   {
     return a;
   }