From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-380973-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6209 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2012 14:55:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 6197 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jan 2012 14:55:52 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:55:40 +0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/51934] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C  -O0  (test for excess errors)  due to "cdecl attribute ignored" warning
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-51934-4-iadcLrDffQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg02648.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934

--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-01-23 14:55:08 UTC ---
> Log:
>     PR target/51934
>     * g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C: Use noreturn instead of cdecl.
>
> Should be fixed now.

The use of 'noreturn' yields a warning with g++ 4.6.2 and not an infinite loop:

[macbook] f90/bug% time g++-fsf-4.6 -c pr51344_db.C
pr51344_db.C: In function 'A& operator>>(A&, B<T>&)':
pr51344_db.C:9:12: warning: function declared 'noreturn' has a 'return'
statement [enabled by default]
0.012u 0.024s 0:00.93 3.2%    0+0k 3+13io 0pf+0w

so IMO the test is no longer testing what has been fixed (see comment #8 for a
list of what I have tried).