public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "marc.glisse at normalesup dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/51938] missed optimization: 2 comparisons
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:54:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-51938-4-913ljCGUBp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-51938-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51938

Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at normalesup dot org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|rtl-optimization            |tree-optimization

--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at normalesup dot org> 2012-06-07 14:54:02 UTC ---
Changing to tree-optimization (doing the optimization at RTL level would
require finite-math-only).

There is plenty of code that corresponds to A&&B and A||B, but (almost) nothing
for A&&!B. Quite a big missing piece...

<bb 2>:
  if (x_2(D) > 0.0)
    goto <bb 5>;
  else
    goto <bb 3>;

<bb 3>:
  if (x_2(D) < 0.0)
    goto <bb 4>;
  else
    goto <bb 5>;

The 2 conditions don't share the same then branch or the same else branch (it
is a mix), so ifcombine doesn't even try to turn it into

  if (x_2(D) > 0.0 || !(x_2(D) < 0.0))
    goto <bb 5>;
  else
    goto <bb 4>;

Besides, it doesn't look like the logic is in place to fold that condition into
just its second half (but I may have missed it).


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-07 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-21 22:54 [Bug tree-optimization/51938] New: " marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
2012-01-23 10:29 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/51938] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-23 13:07 ` marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
2012-06-06 21:23 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-07 14:54 ` marc.glisse at normalesup dot org [this message]
2012-06-08 13:07 ` [Bug tree-optimization/51938] " glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-08 19:49 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-08 20:03 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-06-09 21:36 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-06 16:39 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-06 16:53 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-51938-4-913ljCGUBp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).