From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id C21553858D39; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 22:34:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C21553858D39
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/51954] __int128_t (and long long on x86) negation can be
 optimized
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 22:34:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-51954-4-MVOjfnEv1n@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 22:34:17 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D51954

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We get this now:

        movq    %rdi, %rax
        movq    %rsi, %rdx
        negq    %rax
        adcq    $0, %rdx
        negq    %rdx

ICC produces:
        xorl      %edx, %edx                                    #3.10
        xorl      %eax, %eax                                    #3.10
        subq      %rdi, %rax                                    #3.10
        sbbq      %rsi, %rdx                                    #3.10
        ret                                                     #3.10

Which seems even better.

LLVM does produce:
        movq    %rdi, %rax
        xorl    %edx, %edx
        negq    %rax
        sbbq    %rsi, %rdx

Which basically combines the addcq and negq together and changes one mov in=
to
an exor.=