From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-397143-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29318 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2012 00:11:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 29310 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jul 2012 00:11:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 00:11:32 +0000
From: "steven at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/51975] ICE in gcc in convert_move, at expr.c:326 with fprofile-use when source changes from fprofile-generate
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 00:11:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: steven at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed CC Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-51975-4-gGqPbI9ids@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51975-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51975-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg01729.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51975

Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-07-22
                 CC|                            |steven at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-22 00:11:31 UTC ---
I think the transformation should just be disabled completely if the checksums
don't match. Or if you take this path anyway, you could store the checksums on
the struct function instead of re-computing it for every check.