From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29734 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2012 16:41:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 29540 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jan 2012 16:41:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:41:42 +0000 From: "valyala at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/51981] New: Missing uninitialized_move() implementation? Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:34:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: valyala at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg02808.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51981 Bug #: 51981 Summary: Missing uninitialized_move() implementation? Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: valyala@gmail.com It's interesting to know why uninitialized_copy()'s counterpart - uninitialized_move() - is missing in http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/bits/stl_uninitialized.h?revision=177542&view=markup ? See boost's docs for details - http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_48_0/doc/html/boost/uninitialized_move.html .