From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12662 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2012 15:50:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 12651 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jan 2012 15:50:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:50:40 +0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/52001] [4.7 Regression] Huge compile-time regression with var-tracking Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:13:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status AssignedTo Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg03051.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52001 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-26 15:50:20 UTC --- Created attachment 26472 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26472 gcc47-pr52001.patch Untested fix. It doesn't make any sense to insert any reverse ops when V is already known to have a location which is certainly simpler than that and permanently available through the entire function.