From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29246 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2012 15:40:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 29225 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2012 15:40:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:40:44 +0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/52008] [C++0x] ICE when adding partial specialization for variadic-templated structure Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:40:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: SUSPENDED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg01745.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52008 Paolo Carlini changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |SUSPENDED --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-20 15:40:09 UTC --- The issue isn't whether it's a specialization or not, but whether it's technically more specialized. I didn't personally check in detail but Jason argued on the ISO reflector that is not ([c++std-core-21739]). And the reason why currently other front-ends accept the code is that they pick the primary for the instantiation. Thus this should be made more explicitly ill-formed in the standard with a DR. Let's suspend the PR for now.