From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30442 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2013 20:11:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30084 invoked by uid 48); 3 Nov 2013 20:09:45 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/52015] std::to_string does not work under MinGW Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 20:11:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00139.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015 --- Comment #31 from Jonathan Wakely --- Or to put it another way, this bug only affects MinGW users, is blocked by a limitation in MinGW, and noone from MinGW has offered to do anything about it, but you're pointing fingers at GCC devs and saying there's a GCC clique? Who is preventing MinGW devs joining this clique? If you want to improve the situation I suggest not throwing around words like abuse, and instead gently correcting misunderstandings by demonstrating that this can indeed be fixed in MinGW. But that fix probably has to come from MinGW.