From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23962 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2012 18:22:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 23953 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jan 2012 18:22:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:22:01 +0000 From: "howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libitm/52042] libitm.c/clone-1.c and libitm.c/stackundo.c execution tests are not pie compatible Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libitm X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg03558.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2012-01-30 18:21:09 UTC --- Note that darwin11 leverages the PIC default on darwin to create pie executables by defaulting the linker to -pie when targeting 10.7 or later. The question is whether, like gcc.dg/darwin-segaddr.c, that libitm.c/clone-1.c and libitm.c/stackundo.c are meaningless for pie executables. If so, we should just append -Wl,-no_pie to the flags on those tests as has been done for gcc.dg/darwin-segaddr.c.