From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32137 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2012 20:46:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 32096 invoked by uid 48); 9 Oct 2012 20:46:40 -0000 From: "steven at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/52066] IRA and reginfo initialization too expensive Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: steven at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00878.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52066 Steven Bosscher changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2012-10-09 20:46:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Patch to inline them. Quite ugly, but I can't use extern inline > __attribute__((gnu_inline)), because it uses static inline functions, and > unfortunately some callers of these functions can't include hard-reg-set.h > (targhooks.c). Huh, if it's ok to know about reg-classes in targhooks, why is it not also OK to know about HARD_REG_SET?