From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-382132-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18186 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2012 13:43:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 18173 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Feb 2012 13:43:43 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:43:31 +0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/52079] ICE in aggregate_value_p while building libgo on arm-linux-gnueabihf
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed AssignedTo Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-52079-4-oBBQDozTxY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52079-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52079-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52079

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-02-01
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-01 13:43:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 26542
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26542
gcc47-pr52079.patch

Untested fix.  While the c-family/fortran/lto/ada
lang_hooks.types.type_for_mode returns non-NULL for TImode (it creates a type
for 2 * HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT bitsize), go (and assuming java too) just return
NULL.
This is an attempt to try harder in this case, another alternative would be for
go/java type_for_mode and type_for_size langhooks to return non-NULL for TImode
resp. 128-bit size (using build_nonstandard_integer_type), at least when
HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT >= 64 (like other FEs do).