From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28892 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2012 10:25:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 28882 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Feb 2012 10:25:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:25:22 +0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/52080] Stores to bitfields introduce a store-data-race on adjacent data Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52080 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-01 10:25:21 UTC --- SPARC64 also can do 32bit loads/stores as the following testcase shows: struct x { long a; unsigned int lock; unsigned int full; }; void wrong(struct x *ptr) { ptr->full = 1; } here we simply use a 32bit store.