From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2838 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2012 16:05:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 2826 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Feb 2012 16:05:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:05:23 +0000 From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/52124] New: config/cr16/cr16.c: possibly redundant code Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00476.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52124 Bug #: 52124 Summary: config/cr16/cr16.c: possibly redundant code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: dcb314@hotmail.com I just ran the static analysis checker cppcheck over the latest trunk code and it said [gcc/config/cr16/cr16.c:2024] -> [gcc/config/cr16/cr16.c:2024]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '||'. The source code is return (cfun->calls_alloca || crtl->calls_eh_return || cfun->has_nonlocal_label || crtl->calls_eh_return); which looks to me like one too many mentions of crtl->calls_eh_return, but may mean some other variable has been missed out.