* [Bug libstdc++/52128] [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux
2012-02-06 0:07 [Bug libstdc++/52128] New: [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux mikpe at it dot uu.se
@ 2012-02-06 0:11 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-06 8:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-06 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52128
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2012-02-06
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-06 00:11:28 UTC ---
mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/52128] [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux
2012-02-06 0:07 [Bug libstdc++/52128] New: [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux mikpe at it dot uu.se
2012-02-06 0:11 ` [Bug libstdc++/52128] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-06 8:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-06 9:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-06 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52128
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mario-baumann at web dot de
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-06 08:52:48 UTC ---
*** Bug 52133 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/52128] [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux
2012-02-06 0:07 [Bug libstdc++/52128] New: [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux mikpe at it dot uu.se
2012-02-06 0:11 ` [Bug libstdc++/52128] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-06 8:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-06 9:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-06 9:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-06 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52128
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-06 09:32:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 26579
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26579
does this patch fix it?
I can't reproduce this on
i686-pc-linux-gnu
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
x86_64-unknown-netbsd5.1
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
I don't see those failures in i686-pc-linux-gnu testresults:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg00415.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg00413.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg00410.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg00310.html
What configure command are you running?
Have you tried a clean build in an empty objdir?
what version of binutils are you using?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/52128] [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux
2012-02-06 0:07 [Bug libstdc++/52128] New: [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux mikpe at it dot uu.se
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-06 9:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-06 9:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-06 12:41 ` mario-baumann at web dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-06 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52128
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/52128] [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux
2012-02-06 0:07 [Bug libstdc++/52128] New: [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux mikpe at it dot uu.se
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-06 9:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-06 12:41 ` mario-baumann at web dot de
2012-02-06 12:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: mario-baumann at web dot de @ 2012-02-06 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52128
--- Comment #4 from Mario Baumann <mario-baumann at web dot de> 2012-02-06 12:41:11 UTC ---
Hi Jonathan,
the attached fix works for bug 52133. Thanks!
Mario.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/52128] [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux
2012-02-06 0:07 [Bug libstdc++/52128] New: [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux mikpe at it dot uu.se
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-06 12:41 ` mario-baumann at web dot de
@ 2012-02-06 12:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-06 16:04 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-06 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52128
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-06 12:46:27 UTC ---
Great, thanks for testing it, I'll check it in this evening.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/52128] [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux
2012-02-06 0:07 [Bug libstdc++/52128] New: [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux mikpe at it dot uu.se
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-06 12:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-06 16:04 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
2012-02-06 20:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-06 21:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: mikpe at it dot uu.se @ 2012-02-06 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52128
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> 2012-02-06 16:03:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 26579 [details]
> does this patch fix it?
It does, thanks.
> What configure command are you running?
/tmp/gcc-4.7-20120204/configure --prefix=/tmp/install47
--with-gmp=/home/mikpe/pkgs/linux-x86/gmp-5.0.2
--with-mpfr=/home/mikpe/pkgs/linux-x86/mpfr-3.1.0
--with-mpc=/home/mikpe/pkgs/linux-x86/mpc-0.9
--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx --disable-libquadmath --disable-plugin
--disable-lto --disable-nls --disable-shared --disable-libmudflap
--disable-libgomp --enable-threads=posix --enable-checking=release
--enable-languages=c,c++
> Have you tried a clean build in an empty objdir?
I always build gcc in an empty objdir.
> what version of binutils are you using?
binutils-2.20.51.0.7-8.fc14.i686
Fedora 14 user-space, but with a gcc-4.5.3 host compiler and a linux-3.2
kernel.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/52128] [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux
2012-02-06 0:07 [Bug libstdc++/52128] New: [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux mikpe at it dot uu.se
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-06 16:04 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se
@ 2012-02-06 20:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-06 21:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-06 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52128
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-06 20:51:57 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Feb 6 20:51:52 2012
New Revision: 183942
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183942
Log:
PR libstdc++/52128
* src/c++11/future.cc: Add explicit instantiation.
Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/future.cc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/52128] [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux
2012-02-06 0:07 [Bug libstdc++/52128] New: [4.7 regression] r183788 caused massive libstdc++ testsuite regression on i686-linux mikpe at it dot uu.se
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-06 20:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-06 21:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-06 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52128
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-06 21:24:21 UTC ---
fixed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread