From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-382781-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20770 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2012 13:52:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 20761 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Feb 2012 13:52:40 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:52:27 +0000
From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/52145] [C++11] zero-valued integer constant expression should prefer conversion to pointer
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-52145-4-nL8hdVJnTi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52145-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52145-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00715.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D52145

Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |daniel.kruegler at
                   |                            |googlemail dot com

--- Comment #1 from Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot =
com> 2012-02-07 13:51:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
The core language is in the process to make it clear, that S().n no longer =
is a
null-pointer constant, see

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#903

This would mean that the current behaviour is as intended. I would make the
outcome of this issue dependent on the final CWG 903 decision.