From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10577 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2012 15:52:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 10567 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Feb 2012 15:52:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:52:43 +0000 From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/52163] [4.7 regression] 64bit powerpc libgcc is missing exported symbols Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00868.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52163 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-08 15:52:18 UTC --- Yeah, that might be a good idea. As it would be just an optimization compared to the present state, we might in the first step do it just for the ppc targets that have full float/double support in hw.