From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-383371-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29708 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2012 14:19:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 29698 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Feb 2012 14:19:27 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:19:14 +0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/52178] [4.7 regression] Ada bootstrap failure in LTO mode
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-52178-4-9wlQd2iaIL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52178-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52178-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg01305.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178

--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2012-02-13 14:18:58 UTC ---
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
> 
> Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
>    Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-02-13
>      Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
> 
> --- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-13 14:12:53 UTC ---
> > I'm testing a patch to do that now.
> 
> So am I. :-)  Shouldn't we do something in free_lang_data as well?

Sure, I'm NULLing DECL_QUALIFIER there.  Otherwise it wouldn't fix
the bug as we decide in which section to put the type at compile time.

Richard.