public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug boehm-gc/52179] boehm-gc incompatible with aslr on darwin11
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-52179-4-9vOF0MFZBn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-52179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52179
--- Comment #21 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2012-02-23 18:50:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> > Where do you want the second change made?
>
> Let me repeat myself:
>
> the code is in boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h, so the patch should change
> the ifdef
> DARWIN block there.
>
>
> In the code in the file I mentioned, as a replacement to the #define that
> exists today.
Yes, See the reduced patch I posted in comment 17. Also, if thread_leak_test.c
is twitchy with -pie at -m64, we could also open a PR for that and just skip
this test on darwin11+ at -m64 for now. Assuming that my proposed reversion of
r175182 causes no regressions in libjava on darwin11+.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-23 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-08 23:47 [Bug boehm-gc/52179] New: " howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-08 23:55 ` [Bug boehm-gc/52179] " howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-09 0:35 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-09 0:40 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-09 0:47 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-09 0:57 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-09 15:06 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-11 1:11 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-22 22:32 ` patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
2012-02-23 4:34 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-23 4:40 ` mikestump at comcast dot net
2012-02-23 8:19 ` mikestump at comcast dot net
2012-02-23 15:17 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-23 15:18 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-23 15:42 ` patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
2012-02-23 15:50 ` patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
2012-02-23 15:53 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-23 18:31 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-23 18:38 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-23 18:44 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-23 18:51 ` mikestump at comcast dot net
2012-02-23 18:53 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu [this message]
2012-02-23 18:57 ` patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
2012-02-23 18:58 ` mikestump at comcast dot net
2012-02-23 21:02 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-23 21:57 ` mikestump at comcast dot net
2012-02-23 22:05 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-02-24 15:52 ` pmarlier at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-29 6:04 ` howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
2012-03-02 18:23 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-02 18:35 ` mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-52179-4-9vOF0MFZBn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).