From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-383180-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14060 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2012 22:42:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 14041 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2012 22:42:18 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:41:43 +0000
From: "dave.anglin at bell dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/52201] FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic/operators/51811.cc (test for excess errors)
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:42:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dave.anglin at bell dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-52201-4-YAFfJ6fsFZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52201-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52201-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg01114.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201

--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-02-10 22:41:42 UTC ---
On 2/10/2012 5:26 PM, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52201
>
> Andrew Macleod<amacleod at redhat dot com>  changed:
>
>             What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                   CC|                            |amacleod at redhat dot com
>
> --- Comment #1 from Andrew Macleod<amacleod at redhat dot com>  2012-02-10 22:26:59 UTC ---
> Does this target support atomics and multi-threaded at all?
>
> do any tests in gcc/gcc.dg/atomic* run or are they all unsupported?
>
The target doesn't support atomics.  There is only only one atomic 
instruction (ldcw).

There is pthread and semaphore support.

gcc.dg/atomic-flag.c, gcc.dg/atomic-generic.c, gcc.dg/atomic-lockfree.c, 
gcc.dg/atomic-noinline-aux.c,
gcc.dg/atomic-noinline.c pass.  The remainder are unsupported

Dave