public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions
@ 2012-02-10 23:32 ian at airs dot com
2012-02-10 23:37 ` [Bug target/52205] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 more replies)
0 siblings, 15 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ian at airs dot com @ 2012-02-10 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
Bug #: 52205
Summary: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails
with -fnon-call-exceptions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ian@airs.com
CC: ro@gcc.gnu.org
Compile this C++ program with -fnon-call-exceptions:
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
void
die(const char* msg)
{
perror(msg);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
void
handler(int signo, siginfo_t* info, void *context)
{
printf("in handler signal %d\n", signo);
throw signo;
}
int
main(int, const char**)
{
struct sigaction act;
memset(&act, 0, sizeof act);
act.sa_sigaction = handler;
sigfillset(&act.sa_mask);
act.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
if (sigaction(SIGSEGV, &act, NULL) != 0)
die("sigaction");
try
{
*reinterpret_cast<char*>(0) = 1;
}
catch (int signo)
{
printf("caught signal %d\n", signo);
exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
printf("did not catch\n");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
When this program is run, it should print something like
in handler signal 11
caught signal 11
This works fine on GNU/Linux and on x86 and x86_64 Solaris 2.11. When run on
SPARC Solaris 2.11, however, it prints
in handler signal 11
Segmentation Fault
I see this in both 32-bit and 64-bit mode. If I tweak
libgcc/config/sparc/sol2-unwind.h so that sparc_is_sighandler sets *nframes to
3 rather than 2, then the test passes (I only tried this in 32-bit mode, not in
64-bit mode). The cuh_pattern test in sparc_is_sighandler does not match, so
presumably it needs to be adjusted for Solaris 2.11. However, I'm not sure how
to properly and safely correct it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
@ 2012-02-10 23:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-11 10:48 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-10 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-10 23:34:28 UTC ---
This is a dup of bug 51921.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 51921 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
2012-02-10 23:37 ` [Bug target/52205] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-11 10:48 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-12 4:13 ` ian at airs dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-11 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot
| |gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-11 10:47:46 UTC ---
> I see this in both 32-bit and 64-bit mode. If I tweak
> libgcc/config/sparc/sol2-unwind.h so that sparc_is_sighandler sets *nframes to
> 3 rather than 2, then the test passes (I only tried this in 32-bit mode, not in
> 64-bit mode). The cuh_pattern test in sparc_is_sighandler does not match, so
> presumably it needs to be adjusted for Solaris 2.11. However, I'm not sure how
> to properly and safely correct it.
OK, let's at least try, first in 32-bit mode. What code path is taken exactly
in sparc_is_sighandler on Solaris 11?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
2012-02-10 23:37 ` [Bug target/52205] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-11 10:48 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-12 4:13 ` ian at airs dot com
2012-02-12 10:07 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ian at airs dot com @ 2012-02-12 4:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Last reconfirmed| |2012-02-12
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> 2012-02-12 04:12:07 UTC ---
I'm using a system Rainer gave me access to. It's sparc-sun-solaris2.11.
uname -a reports
SunOS mayon 5.11 11.0 sun4v sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5220 Solaris
readelf -V /lib/libc.so.1 shows that the highest version is SUNW_1.22.7.
Using mainline as of a couple of February 8, 2012 or so. Looking at
libgcc/config/sparc/sol2-unwind.h.
This case matches:
if(/* Solaris 8+ - multi-threaded
----------------------------
<__sighndlr>: save %sp, -96, %sp
<__sighndlr+4>: mov %i0, %o0
<__sighndlr+8>: mov %i1, %o1
<__sighndlr+12>: call %i3
<__sighndlr+16>: mov %i2, %o2
<__sighndlr+20>: ret <--- PC
<__sighndlr+24>: restore */
pc[-5] == 0x9de3bfa0
&& pc[-4] == 0x90100018
&& pc[-3] == 0x92100019
&& pc[-2] == 0x9fc6c000
&& pc[-1] == 0x9410001a
&& pc[ 0] == 0x81c7e008
&& pc[ 1] == 0x81e80000)
In that condition, cuh_pattern is set to 0x92100019. This doesn't match any of
the choices in the code, so it returns 1 with *nframes = 2. In order to work
correctly, it needs to return with *nframes = 3.
cuh_pattern is an instruction loaded from some code. That code looks like
this:
0xff298f48 <call_user_handler+876>: mov %i1, %o1
0xff298f4c <call_user_handler+880>: call 0xff2a552c <__sighndlr>
0xff298f50 <call_user_handler+884>: mov %i5, %o2
0xff298f54 <call_user_handler+888>: ld [ %fp + 0x4c ], %i5
0xff298f58 <call_user_handler+892>: ld [ %fp + 0x44 ], %g5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-12 4:13 ` ian at airs dot com
@ 2012-02-12 10:07 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-12 15:33 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-12 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ebotcazou at gcc dot
|gnu.org |gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-12 10:06:07 UTC ---
Fixing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-12 10:07 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-12 15:33 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-12 19:53 ` ian at airs dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-12 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-12 15:33:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 26643
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26643
Tentative fix
Would you mind giving it a try on the Solaris 11 machine? TIA.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-12 15:33 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-12 19:53 ` ian at airs dot com
2012-02-12 20:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ian at airs dot com @ 2012-02-12 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
--- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> 2012-02-12 19:52:02 UTC ---
The patch fixes the test case and also passes some relevant Go tests.
Rainer, if OK, I'd like to leave it to you to comment on the patch and do a
full testsuite run.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-12 19:53 ` ian at airs dot com
@ 2012-02-12 20:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-14 18:39 ` [Bug target/52205] unwinding through signal handler fails ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-12 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-12 20:24:56 UTC ---
> The patch fixes the test case and also passes some relevant Go tests.
Great. For the records, it was also tested on 5 different versions of Solaris
8, 9 and 10, covering all the cases in the code, both 32-bit and 64-bit.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] unwinding through signal handler fails
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-12 20:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-14 18:39 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2012-02-14 22:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2012-02-14 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2012-02-14 18:39:32 UTC ---
> --- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> 2012-02-12 19:52:02 UTC ---
> The patch fixes the test case and also passes some relevant Go tests.
>
> Rainer, if OK, I'd like to leave it to you to comment on the patch and do a
> full testsuite run.
I'm currently doing so, and preliminary results look good. I've got a
couple of comments on the patch as-is which I find harder than necessary
to read/understand:
* It uses far too magic numbers unnecessarily and/or without
explanation. E.g. looking for the caller frame with hardcoded offsets
(cuh_patter, sah_address) is unnecessary: just use struct frame in
<sys/frame.h> for that, where fr_savfp is the saved frame pointer at
that exact offset.
* All the patterns should be acompanied by the disassembly to make it
easier to compare with that you see e.g. in a debugger.
* Talking of Solaris 8 in Solaris Containers is unnecessary and
incomplete: this is just the Solaris 8 alternate thread library (in
/usr/lib/lwp) which is copied over /usr/lib/libthread.so.1 when
booting the branded zone, but is also used by gcc on Solaris 8 by
default. This alternate thread library became the default in Solaris
9, thus they are the same.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] unwinding through signal handler fails
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-14 18:39 ` [Bug target/52205] unwinding through signal handler fails ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2012-02-14 22:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-15 8:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-14 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-14 22:04:35 UTC ---
> I'm currently doing so, and preliminary results look good. I've got a
> couple of comments on the patch as-is which I find harder than necessary
> to read/understand:
>
> * It uses far too magic numbers unnecessarily and/or without
> explanation. E.g. looking for the caller frame with hardcoded offsets
> (cuh_patter, sah_address) is unnecessary: just use struct frame in
> <sys/frame.h> for that, where fr_savfp is the saved frame pointer at
> that exact offset.
>
> * All the patterns should be acompanied by the disassembly to make it
> easier to compare with that you see e.g. in a debugger.
>
> * Talking of Solaris 8 in Solaris Containers is unnecessary and
> incomplete: this is just the Solaris 8 alternate thread library (in
> /usr/lib/lwp) which is copied over /usr/lib/libthread.so.1 when
> booting the branded zone, but is also used by gcc on Solaris 8 by
> default. This alternate thread library became the default in Solaris
> 9, thus they are the same.
Fine with me (I won't make any of these changes myself though).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] unwinding through signal handler fails
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-14 22:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-15 8:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-15 8:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-15 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
AssignedTo|ebotcazou at gcc dot |unassigned at gcc dot
|gnu.org |gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] unwinding through signal handler fails
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-15 8:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-15 8:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-15 8:22 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-15 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-15 08:13:29 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Feb 15 08:13:22 2012
New Revision: 184256
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184256
Log:
PR target/51921
PR target/52205
* config/sparc/sol2-unwind.h (sparc64_is_sighandler): Add support for
Solaris 11 and slightly reformat.
(sparc_is_sighandler): Likewise.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/sparc/sol2-unwind.h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] unwinding through signal handler fails
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-15 8:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-15 8:22 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-16 19:54 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-15 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-15 08:13:20 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Feb 15 08:13:09 2012
New Revision: 184255
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184255
Log:
PR target/51921
PR target/52205
* config/sparc/sol2-unwind.h (sparc64_is_sighandler): Add support for
Solaris 11 and slightly reformat.
(sparc_is_sighandler): Likewise.
Modified:
trunk/libgcc/ChangeLog
trunk/libgcc/config/sparc/sol2-unwind.h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] unwinding through signal handler fails
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-15 8:22 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-16 19:54 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2012-05-26 13:56 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-26 14:12 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2012-02-16 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2012-02-16 19:46:02 UTC ---
> Fine with me (I won't make any of these changes myself though).
I'll probably give it a whirl, but only after 4.7 has branched. For
4.8, there might be considerably simplifications possible since the old
MxN libthread is gone then.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] unwinding through signal handler fails
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-16 19:54 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2012-05-26 13:56 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-26 14:12 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-05-26 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-26 13:49:41 UTC ---
.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/52205] unwinding through signal handler fails
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2012-05-26 13:56 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-05-26 14:12 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-05-26 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-26 14:02:12 UTC ---
.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-26 14:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-10 23:32 [Bug target/52205] New: SPARC Solaris 2.11 unwind through signal handler fails with -fnon-call-exceptions ian at airs dot com
2012-02-10 23:37 ` [Bug target/52205] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-11 10:48 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-12 4:13 ` ian at airs dot com
2012-02-12 10:07 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-12 15:33 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-12 19:53 ` ian at airs dot com
2012-02-12 20:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-14 18:39 ` [Bug target/52205] unwinding through signal handler fails ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2012-02-14 22:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-15 8:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-15 8:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-15 8:22 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-16 19:54 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2012-05-26 13:56 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-26 14:12 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).