public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/52215] [4.7 Regression] __atomic_compare_exchange_n for enumeration type changes signature with -m32
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-52215-4-KZVUzSnW4U@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-52215-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52215

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-13 13:59:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 26650
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26650
gcc47-pr52215.patch

Untested fix.  I think it is wrong to decide this based on TYPE_SIZE,
we want to IMHO convert just the I[1248] and I16 arg_types, but not the PTR,
BOOL or INT ones (i.e. arguments in which have the overloaded types, not the
arguments that hold pointers to them or have invariant types).


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-13 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-12 13:23 [Bug libstdc++/52215] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: ext/profile/mutex_extensions_neg.cc (test for excess errors) dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2012-02-12 13:57 ` [Bug libstdc++/52215] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-12 14:14 ` [Bug c++/52215] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-12 14:24 ` [Bug c++/52215] __atomic_compare_exchange_n for enumeration type changes signature with -m32 redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-12 20:49 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-13 11:30 ` [Bug c++/52215] [4.7 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-13 14:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-02-13 15:28 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2012-02-13 20:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-13 20:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-52215-4-KZVUzSnW4U@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).