From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11606 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2012 08:38:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 11517 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Feb 2012 08:38:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:38:05 +0000 From: "jojelino at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r183675,r184021 needs to be fixed. Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:39:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libffi X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: blocker X-Bugzilla-Who: jojelino at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg01772.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 --- Comment #12 from gee 2012-02-17 08:38:01 UTC --- Created attachment 26692 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26692 proposed patch without trampoline diff (In reply to comment #10) > I see here three issues about this patch. > > First, you don't treat stack-alignment. > Second, why you emulate here stack-argument cleanup for ret __size-4? Why not > stick to already present variant? > Thirs, you corrupt arguments after the second. > yes. sorry for unnecessary trampoline diff. does this patch solves the issues?