public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r183675,r184021 needs to be fixed. Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:01:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-52221-4-mZjXiRdfKH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-52221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 --- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-16 20:37:28 UTC --- I see here three issues about this patch. First, you don't treat stack-alignment. Second, why you emulate here stack-argument cleanup for ret __size-4? Why not stick to already present variant? Thirs, you corrupt arguments after the second. That this patch works for you might be true, but it is for sure in general wrong.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-16 21:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-02-12 17:22 [Bug libffi/52221] New: [libffi] r184021 " jojelino at gmail dot com 2012-02-12 17:58 ` [Bug libffi/52221] " ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-13 15:18 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-13 15:19 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-13 17:02 ` jojelino at gmail dot com 2012-02-13 18:35 ` jojelino at gmail dot com 2012-02-13 21:06 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-15 21:43 ` [Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r183675,r184021 " jojelino at gmail dot com 2012-02-16 20:20 ` jojelino at gmail dot com 2012-02-16 21:01 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2012-02-16 21:06 ` jojelino at gmail dot com 2012-02-16 23:35 ` jojelino at gmail dot com 2012-02-17 8:39 ` jojelino at gmail dot com 2012-02-17 9:07 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-22 18:23 ` jojelino at gmail dot com 2012-02-23 21:04 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-23 21:28 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-52221-4-mZjXiRdfKH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).