From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3909 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2014 21:15:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3858 invoked by uid 48); 20 Jun 2014 21:15:26 -0000 From: "egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/52268] tls support should be added for darwin11 Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 21:15:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg01708.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268 Eric Gallager changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- I'm kind of confused about whether gcc actually has tls support on darwin or not; I could have sworn I was able to use gcc 4.8 to compile some code that used `__thread` on darwin the other day, but according to this bug, that should have been impossible, right? Did gcc just ignore it silently or something?