From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 177ED3861870; Thu,  2 Jul 2020 18:41:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 177ED3861870
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1593715268;
 bh=9iSBsrkC2W+ZvSdTXcx1PIUZuxWpAAre7gOiNRMnb5Q=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=ln5wKrHOkfk4+PvsIMhPm2DKxUTIdnnflmZ/TMP3jDEuwlvJFH8AeCh2sCX6GeUua
 YLKVkhns7U0JpT8AsXwOKvR/pa8BAMxZqgwOwYBGEYSRZTc2UACoG3ENzU6UHcnv4a
 324wLc9mZ9v7GkfeWRvm+lSD4xq0cXTdMx0gmn6Q=
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/52279] Fortran translation issues
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 18:41:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-52279-4-F0pEPLPzYS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52279-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52279-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 18:41:08 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D52279

--- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> =
---
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 05:24:36PM +0000, schwab@linux-m68k.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D52279
>=20
> --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
> If it was enabled by default, you cannot negate it.
>=20

I have no idea what you're writing about, or if you're
addressing me or jakub.

All I can do is explain what gfortran does, and the intended
designed behavior of the -fallow-invalid-boz option.  The
negation of the option is to not specify it among your options.=