From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8CB023861872; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 15:53:22 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8CB023861872 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1593705202; bh=epnzJT4x/NxRWvxCkRAPI8NZUFmCFawkY/htMKubtfs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=E50sHOhRb3jlp3QJnryHPM5lws+Zv6whHD0D7ih1+Hk4bOx4/Nk8kGh+rm9bN6zdi IaqDNCYbGSRqh+ja6qGNDB/ylF9UUv+nANbZ9aqrDhQCT7zYzFOMiO3N7XxcXuK0c8 H9QN5n5j0AYNdMpK3jF8tb/3va9bqzUqyj+kh3p8= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/52279] Fortran translation issues Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 15:53:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 15:53:22 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D52279 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to kargl from comment #6) > There is no -fno-allow-invalid-boz option. The option is > -fallow-invalid-boz. fortan/lang.opt defines the options > with the RejectNegative annotation. Why is it RejectNegative? Is there some other option that acts as it negat= ive option? If it is just a standalone boolean option, it should have a negati= ve, so that if e.g. one uses -fallow-invalid-boz in $FFLAGS for most of files in some project, but there is a specific one that shouldn't allow it, one can = just append -fno-allow-invalid-boz for it to cancel the earlier option.=