From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-383769-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22996 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2012 19:40:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 22957 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Feb 2012 19:40:43 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:40:31 +0000
From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/52282] [C++0x] ICE / confused by earlier errors with decltype/constexpr
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-52282-4-kicMDB1ziI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52282-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52282-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg01703.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D52282

Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |daniel.kruegler at
                   |                            |googlemail dot com

--- Comment #1 from Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot =
com> 2012-02-16 19:24:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Note that non-static member function pointers do not generate either issu=
es,
> although it is necessary to add "const" to the pointer type but not to the
> corresponding function definition:

Adding const to the function type is required, because the constexpr specif=
ier
for any non-static member functions behaves as if the function were declare=
d as
const member function.